Other Court Documents
Court Decisions:
- Opinion and Order re: Motion to Dismiss, dated March 26, 2008
- Stipulation And Order Terminating Proposed Partial Settlement, dated June 22, 2007
- Decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Petition for Rehearing of December 5, 2006 Decision Reversing District Court’s Grant of Motion for Class Certification, dated April 6, 2007
- Decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals Vacating and Remanding Class Certification Order, dated December 5, 2006
- Decision on Class Certification, dated October 13, 2004
- Decision on Motions to Dismiss, dated February 19, 2003
Briefs:
- Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification in Six Focus Cases, dated March 28, 2008
- The Underwriter Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification in Six Focus Cases, dated December 21, 2007
- The Issuer Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification in Six Focus Cases, dated December 21, 2007
- Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Issuer and Underwriter Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, dated December 21, 2007
- Memorandum in Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, dated November 14, 2007
- Notice of Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, dated November 14, 2007
- Memorandum of Law in Support of the Issuer Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaints, dated November 13, 2007
- Issuer Defendants’ Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the Second Consolidated Amended Complaints, dated November 13, 2007
- Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification in Six Focus Cases, dated September 27, 2007
- Notice of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification in Six Focus Cases, dated September 27, 2007
- Brief For Defendant-Appellant Underwriters In Response To Plaintiffs-Appellees’ Petition For Rehearing (Miles v. Merrill Lynch), dated February 7, 2007
- Petition For Rehearing And Rehearing En Banc (Miles v. Merrill Lynch), dated January 5, 2007
- Appellees' Brief in Miles v. Merrill Lynch (05-3349-cv), dated December 19, 2005
- Brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America as Amicus Curiae Supporting Defendants-Appellants and Supporting Reversal of Class Certification Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), dated October 13, 2005
- Brief for Defendant-Appellant Underwriters Seeking Reversal of Class Certification Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), dated October 3, 2005
- Appendix 1 in Support of Omnibus Motion for Intervention, dated September 2, 2003
- Notice of Omnibus Motion for Intervention and Memorandum of Law in Support of Omnibus Motion for Intervention, dated September 2, 2003
- Appendix 2 in Support of Omnibus Motion for Class Certification, dated September 2, 2003
- Appendix 1 in Support of Omnibus Motion for Class Certification, dated September 2, 2003
- Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Omnibus Motion for Class Certification, dated September 2, 2003
- Notice of Omnibus Motion for Class Certification, dated September 2, 2003
- Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Issuer Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaints, dated September 27, 2002
- Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss All Section 11 Claims (Reply Brief 6), dated September 13, 2002
- Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss All Analyst Claims (Reply Brief 5), dated September 13, 2002
- Reply Memorandum in Further Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Market Manipulation and Other Claims Based on Tie-In Allegations (Reply Brief 4), dated September 13, 2002
- Reply Memorandum in Further Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Undisclosed Compensation Claims (Reply Brief 3), dated September 13, 2002
- Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of the Underwriter Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Plead Reliance, Loss Causation or Scienter (Reply Brief 2)
- Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of the Underwriter Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Plead Fraud with Particularity (Reply Brief 1), dated September 13, 2002
- Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Issuer Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaints, dated August 27, 2002
- Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Section 11 Claims (Opposition to Brief 6) (Corrected), dated August 21, 2002
- Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss All Market Manipulation, Tie-In, Undisclosed Compensation and Analyst Claims (Opposition to Briefs 3, 4 and 5) (Corrected), dated August 21, 2002
- Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Plead Fraud with Particularity and Failure to Plead Scienter, Loss Causation or Reliance (Opposition to Briefs 1 and 2) (Corrected), dated August 21, 2002
- Errata to Memorandum of Law in Support of Issuer Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaints, dated July 22, 2002
- Memorandum of Law in Support of Issuer Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaints, dated July 15, 2002
- Memorandum in Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss All Section 11 Claims (Brief 6) (Corrected), dated July 1, 2002
- Memorandum in Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motions to Dismiss All Analyst Claims (Brief 5) (Corrected), dated July 1, 2002
- Memorandum in Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Market Manipulation and Other Claims Based on Tie-In Allegations (Brief 4) (Corrected), dated July 1, 2002
- Memorandum in Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Undisclosed Compensation Claims (Brief 3) (Corrected), dated July 1, 2002
- Memorandum in Support of the Underwriter Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Plead Reliance, Loss Causation or Scienter (Brief 2) (Corrected), dated July 1, 2002
NOTE: This website is being provided as a service to potential Class Members. The information provided is in summary form and is not intended as a complete explanation of your rights, nor does it serve to provide legal or professional advice. To become more informed about the Litigation, you are directed to review carefully the legal documents linked to the tabs on the left side of this page.